The Manchurian Candidate

Films have always been an outlet for a disoriented society with themes of politics, religion, relationship and illness movies are the way the modern military man deals with its hardships and examines its own motives and actions. The Manchurian nominee is one of the more controversial films in this eye-opening genre, with policy-making themes running strong throughout in such a way as to seemingly point fingers and make strongly imperious remarks about our current semipolitical situation.The 2004 film was remade from an earlier 1962 version, which before taking that format was really a novel written by Richard Condon in 1959. Its political premise was originally based on the Cold fight the book and the original film shied away from the usual opinion that it was Communists who were just misguided and instead portrayed a serviceman where Communists, Capitalists and e genuinelybody in betwixt was faulted ideologically. The masses in Condons book existed within a conspirative net that saw brainwashed operatives of the Communist Party seeking to maintain office and exploit their position for monetary gains (Gianos 1998).The 2004 version, by contrast, has been quite distinctly adapted for the age of the War on Terror, with Communists replaced by the spick-and-span perceived enemy, corporate giants, in this case Manchurian globular. It becomes clear as the movie progresses that the main characters have been brainwashed by Manchurian Global to protect and grow the interests of the corporation.One character, under the direct influence of his cause hungry mother, seeks election into office, season the other is representative of an entire function of the military in supporting his campaign. This latter character, Marco, becomes suspicious of his own actions concerning the vice-presidential candidate, Shaw, when he realizes that he and every other military officer who served with his is exploitation the exact same words to describe their support of the man fundamentally that he is a wonderful man and an excellent soldier who leave alone make the best vice-president.Marco recalls he is suffering from a mental illness, and seeks process from the military doctors who are pledged to offer comprehensive care pursual service in the army. They seem willing to help until Marco finally refuses the pills they take giving him. He claims they dont work and that he wants something different, besides the doctors wont do anything for him in fact they are very concerned about his refusal to accept their treatment. In the block up, Marco pieces together the entire report card that he has forgotten while serving together in the army, he and his companions, including Shaw, were brainwashed by Manchurian Global to support the candidacy of Shaw while Shaw himself was groomed to take the vice-presidency.Through the brainwashing, the corporation expected to gain mettlesome level contracts and a huge amount of money and power. It falls to Marco to set off the plot and explain it to Shaw before he gives the company and all the people connected to the plot exactly what they want. It is a story of corruption in government and the overall will of those in powerful places to exploit whoever is infallible to stay on top and bring in the cash.The reverberations of this film in current American politics is very strong and very controversial. governmental controversy in film is of course not a new thing Brian Nerve explains that Hollywood has been a refuge for the suspicious world since its earliest days, and that movies standardised The Manchurian Candidate are not the crossway of unsound minds but of a lack of transparency throughout the political world (Nerve 1992).This movie in particular has been built upon that ever-present facet of the American usual the conspiracy theory. Whether its a Presidential black lotion or a corporate cover-up, Americans want to know every elaborate and whether or not there are real consp iracies of this magnitude actually occurring is difficult to tell when marvels constantly go unanswered and the imagination takes over. to a greater extent than anything, Manchurian Global has a startling likeness to American corporations like Halliburton, who have in recent years been harshly chided for their role in global inequality and exploitation in the name of money.The people in league with Manchurian Global are portrayed as fundamentally heartless, inhuman and scandalous these elements of scandal can always be ensnare in political films according to Gillespie and Lerner (2000). The producers were well aware of the parallels they were drawing amid their characters and the members of Americas present government, and the audience was generally predisposed to believe the worst of its government before seeing such a shocking story of manipulation played out for them onscreen. They wonder if they are existence brainwashed to accept a fabricated reality, or if they are solely not seeing the whole picture.In its entirety, The Manchurian Candidate has questioned the verity of media portrayals of events in such a way as the American public truly wanted to see however the movie was so undeniably outrageous in its plot details that instead of reinforcing the idea that the government is hiding something from the public all it really did was make the audience question their current beliefs concerning conspiracy.Few people are prepared to believe shrill military brainwashing, and this is the major weak point in the film. The Manchurian Candidate is a movie that sets itself far apart from mainstream entertainment in its political aspects and ideas. It has drawn an audience mostly intent on getting angered at the state of government and politics, though unfortunately in the end it falls short. Instead of solidifying current thought patterns or expanding on them, the film merely sparks doubt in the minds of those most willing to believe its plot. All in all, T he Manchurian Candidate is quite unworthy of the hype. industrial plant CitedGianos, Phillip. Politics and Politicians in American Film. CT Praeger Publishers, 1998.Nerve, Brian. Film and Politics in America A Social Tradition. New York Routledge, 1992.Schultz, David. Its Show Time Media, Politics, and best-selling(predicate) Culture. New York Peter Lang, 2000.